After 3 hours of citizen comments, anti-discrimination law heading to committee

You may also like...

  • Denise Gilbey Moe

    Hello! I just wanted you and the Current to know that there were not more people speaking FOR the ordinance because we decided to respect the Council’s time and purposely limit our speakers. We chose a wide diverse group of people to speak for the ordinance coming from different angles and we purposely limited it out of respect for the council’s and public’s time. We could have had far more speakers but chose not to.
    Chat Conversation End
    CameraChoose a sticker or emoticon

    • Adam Aasen

      Thanks, that’s why I wrote: “More people spoke against the ordinance than for it, but the actual crowd in attendance appeared to be evenly split.” I take no sides but in my view it appeared to be evenly split based on stickers and those that attended the rally