Carmel schools could change policy to allow guns in vehicles

5
It will no longer be a felony to have a gun secured in the trunk of a car on school property once a new state law goes into effect July 1. (Staff photo)

It will no longer be a felony to have a gun secured in the trunk of a car on school property once a new state law goes into effect July 1. (Staff photo)

By Amanda Foust

Many school board policy changes were proposed at the June 9 school board meeting, the most striking of which was a change to the district’s weapons policy.

The policy prohibits students, staff and teachers from carrying guns on school grounds, but it will now allow them to keep weapons secure in vehicle trunks and glove boxes on school property as long as the weapon is out of sight.

Federal law has sought to prohibit guns on or around school property since the 1990s when the Gun-Free School Zones Act was passed.

But the district’s proposed policy change would bring the district in line with a new state law that was passed this year and which will go into effect July 1.

Gun advocates have said the law will remove the prospect of committing a felony for parents who have legal gun permits and have a weapon in their vehicle while they are picking up their children.

Phillips

Phillips

School Board Member Greg Phillips said, “We have no choice but to implement a mistake.”

The other school board members and superintendent Nicholas Wahl did not disagree.

In fact, board president Layla Spanenberg said, “We would prefer not to have any weapons on school property.”

But she said she was informed by the district’s lawyers that the board is prohibited by state law from enacting a policy that would ban weapons in all circumstances.

Most of Carmel’s Republican legislative officials (Rep. Steve Braun, Rep. Jerry Torr, Sen. Mike Delph and Sen. Scott Schneider) voted to approve the new state law with the exception of Republican State Sen. Luke Kenley.

“Gov. Mike Pence believes in the right to keep and bear arms and that this is a common sense reform of the law that accomplishes the goal of keeping parents and law-abiding citizens from being charged with a felony when they pick their kids up at school or go to cheer on the local basketball team,” the governor’s office said in a statement at the time of the bill’s signing.

Spanenberg

Spanenberg

However, the school board still needs to vote on the policy change at its next meeting on June 23.

Other policy change recommendations that the board will consider at that time include the following policies: parent involvement, college and university programs, educational options, guidance and counseling, home-bound instructional programs, reproductive health and family planning, restraint and seclusion, and wellness.

The policy change regarding teaching reproductive health and family planning garnered the most discussion at the June 9 meeting, but Spanenberg said it was needed to eliminate a redundancy between two existing policies.

Philips said that while he personally had concerns it could lead to abstinence-only education, that no one had suggested implementing such a change.

Share.

5 Comments

  1. Thorvington Finglethorpe on

    …So don’t ban them in “all circumstances,” just ban them in a staggering list of circumstances so comprehensive that trying to find a legal time to bring a gun to school is basically impossible. Like say, “If more than two students are on school property nobody may have a gun on school property.”

    It avoids the unconstitutional total ban, but let’s the district set appropriate policies for their own property and student safety.

  2. Bruce Braden on

    The lack of respect for life is codified in the Old Testament. The god therein has no respect for the lives of adults, children, including the unborn in the womb. This god commits or orders mass genocide/holocausts numerous times because he is a jealous god. Hosea 13:16 has this god commanding that unborn babies be slashed from wombs, infants to be smashed against rocks. It is time people of earth redo their theologies and mythologies. Thousands of years of this barbarity and delusion is enough. Any intelligent designer of life would expect as much.
    The notion that “God” needs praise and adoration is absurd. Just another example of Man projecting onto god his own attributes and needs. No god worth his salt would need anything from Man.

  3. Nicki McNally on

    Sen. Luke Kenley did not vote against this. He voted against the original bill in January. Once the guns in school parking lots amendment was added, he voted Yea, in March. Current in Carmel should issue a correction. Carmel voters should know that Sen. Kenley supported this dangerous legislation.

Leave A Reply